Your Performance Profile

Bring your test results together, understand your performance, and find one useful next step.

Reading locally saved test records…

UNDERSTAND YOUR RESULTS

How to use your performance profile

Profile brings together test records saved in this browser. Start with one reaction or memory task, then explore other areas. Your personal report appears above when records are available.

Start with a task, then look for change

Begin with standard reaction time or a memory test. Keep your device and input method consistent when retesting. A single change does not establish a training effect or a decline.

Six ways to view task performance

Reaction, memory, attention, decision, task execution and performance under pressure organize observations from different tasks. They are not six independently validated personality traits. Read each dimension alongside the tasks you completed.

Keep scores and references distinct

Milliseconds, levels and recalled items are task results. Reference scores help interpret them; provisional estimates are not verified global population ranks. Missing records or unclear comparison conditions should not produce an invented rank.

Questions about your profile

Why are my results missing in another browser or on my phone?

Personal records stay in this browser and do not automatically sync across devices. Clearing site data, switching browsers or using another device can make earlier local records unavailable here.

Is the profile useful before I complete all six dimensions?

Yes. Start with existing valid records and add missing tasks later. Completion describes coverage, not equal measurement accuracy across dimensions.

Does a larger radar chart mean higher intelligence?

No. The chart organizes specific task observations. It is not an IQ test or clinical diagnosis and cannot establish career suitability or fixed talent.

How can I compare two results meaningfully?

Prefer records from the same task, protocol and input conditions. Consider speed, accuracy and repeat performance. Avoid treating one lucky score as stable ability or mixing devices and modes.

Where do scores and references come from?

Start with recorded scores. Historical coverage and comparable results may count different records.

Read scoring and record notes

Scores come from saved attempts

Milliseconds, levels and item counts come from test records saved in this browser. Latest and personal-best scores are different observations, not fixed abilities.

References are not measured global ranks

Current reference scales use provisional project rules, not validated population norms. Estimated Top does not describe an observed population proportion; combining reference scores does not establish an overall population percentile.

Why can overview and detail counts differ?

The ordinary Profile overview and dimension details use the same production record-eligibility rules. Historical records remain visible, but records without comparable conditions do not contribute to reference scores. Saved history is not automatically a valid same-condition result. Distinguish all linked tests from the core tests contributing to a dimension.

Match conditions before comparing

Prefer the same task, mode, version and input method. Similar dates or scores alone cannot establish comparability when these conditions were not saved.

Personal records stay in the browser

These notes do not read personal scores. Public HTML and page structured data contain no personal records. Sharing the page URL does not transfer your locally saved results.

Current calculation and interpretation scope by dimension

Reaction

Keep the existing mapping from standard reaction scores to a provisional task curve. Game scenarios remain separate; estimated Top does not describe an observed population proportion.

Memory

Keep the existing task reference scores and combination rule. Averaging references does not create a memory percentile calibrated against a joint population distribution.

Attention

Interpret Schulte time, Stroop condition response time and interference cost separately, without inventing a global attention rank.

Decision

Keep task conditions and dynamic-reaction stages separate rather than averaging unlike metrics into a global decision percentile.

Task execution

Keep existing task reference rules. CPS is a supplementary motor-rate observation, not a cognitive executive-function rank.

Under pressure

Keep scenario, conflict and survival-practice observations separate. Missing matching reference conditions do not justify a cross-task rank.

Notes reviewed: 2026-10-21 · public-method-v1 (notes version, not a calculation model version)