Match search and ordering conditions
Schulte records time to complete a specified grid and ordering rule. Confirm size, mode and input method. Do not infer units from a value alone or combine historical records from different protocols.
Finish the task and follow the rule: explore your search speed and interaction performance.
Loading dimension detail data…
UNDERSTAND YOUR RESULTS
This dimension observes speed and accuracy in visual search and rule-based interaction. It is a ClickReflex task framework, not a full assessment of executive function, self-discipline, workplace productivity or the ability to achieve life goals.
Schulte records time to complete a specified grid and ordering rule. Confirm size, mode and input method. Do not infer units from a value alone or combine historical records from different protocols.
CPS records clicks per second. It offers a supplementary motor-rate experience, not a measure of visual processing speed or cognitive execution. It should not directly become this dimension's cognitive rank.
Review completion time alongside matching personal records. The attention page focuses on search and interference; this page focuses on rule-based task completion and personal changes. The same Schulte result supports two views, not two independent ability measurements. CPS adds clicking-rate context, not a cognitive rank.
| Task | What is observed here | Not equivalent to |
|---|---|---|
| Schulte grid | Search and completion time under a specified rule | Full executive function or intelligence |
| CPS clicking | Motor output frequency over a fixed duration | Cognitive processing speed or self-discipline |
| Matching retests | Changes in these task observations | Work output, daily execution or a causal training effect |
No. It concerns search and rule-based task interaction, not procrastination, self-discipline, goal management or real-world productivity.
You cannot infer that. Click frequency describes motor output, which differs from visual search and rule processing. A motor task does not replace a cognitive assessment.
Avoid comparing them directly. Grid size, order mode and interaction method change the demands. Start with personal records under matching conditions.
Keep it as a historical observation rather than guessing units or protocol from its value. Complete a new test with explicit conditions and begin comparisons with matching records.
Start with recorded scores. Historical coverage and comparable results may count different records.
Milliseconds, levels and item counts come from test records saved in this browser. Latest and personal-best scores are different observations, not fixed abilities.
Current reference scales use provisional project rules, not validated population norms. Estimated Top does not describe an observed population proportion; combining reference scores does not establish an overall population percentile.
The ordinary Profile overview and dimension details use the same production record-eligibility rules. Historical records remain visible, but records without comparable conditions do not contribute to reference scores. Saved history is not automatically a valid same-condition result. Distinguish all linked tests from the core tests contributing to a dimension.
Prefer the same task, mode, version and input method. Similar dates or scores alone cannot establish comparability when these conditions were not saved.
These notes do not read personal scores. Public HTML and page structured data contain no personal records. Sharing the page URL does not transfer your locally saved results.
Keep existing task reference rules. CPS is a supplementary motor-rate observation, not a cognitive executive-function rank.
Notes reviewed: 2026-10-21 · public-method-v1 (notes version, not a calculation model version)